If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally to what is a safe distance from a cell tower , ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.