If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in a wide range of potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
safe distance from cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.