If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. safe distance from cell tower appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. Check out this site are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.