What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

safe distance from cell tower  are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.

While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.



This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.