If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
safe distance from cell tower is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. follow this link is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.